Commissions
Education Committee
Prof. Ayhan Yıldız
Prof. İbrahim Gençsoylu
Assoc. Prof. Zahide Özdemir
Assoc. Prof. Ümit Özyılmaz
Assis. Prof. Dr. Yunus Korkom
Responsibilities and Activities
- Collection of project/thesis topics and organization of presentation schedules (seminars)
Timeline: Fall semester
Responsible: Project/Thesis Committee
- Review and evaluation of the undergraduate curriculum and its up-to-dateness
- Academic performance and dropout analyses
- Graduate and employer surveys
Timeline: Annually (May–June)
- Collection of graduate seminar topics
Timeline: —
- Program Learning Outcomes Evaluation Meeting
Timeline: Annually (May–June)
Student Development and Opportunity Programs
Objective: To support students’ academic and professional development
Activities:
- Double major and minor program introduction meetings
- Introduction of TÜBİTAK 2209-A / 2209-B projects
- Promotion of international exchange programs
Timeline: First month of each semester (October and March)
Quality Committee
Prof. Cafer Turgut
Prof. Ömer Erincik
Assoc. Prof. Filiz ErbaÅŸ
Assis. Prof. Dr. Melis Yalçın
Assis. Prof. Dr. Sevdiye Yorgancı
Res. Assit. Dr. Mehmet Alper Kesici
Assessment, Evaluation and Feedback
Objective: Data-driven improvement of educational quality and verification of learning outcomes through quantitative data
Activities:
- Evaluation of Program Learning Outcomes (PLO) achievement rates
The assessment and evaluation process is based on the Course Contribution Matrix (Table 3.6), where each compulsory course’s contribution level (High / Medium / Low) to relevant PLOs is defined. This matrix must be updated at the beginning of each academic year.
Each course syllabus includes direct assessment tools (project reports, laboratory reports, fieldwork reports, graduation thesis, presentations, assignments) to measure relevant PLOs. These tools generate concrete performance data from student work.
The assessment process operates as follows:
- At the end of each semester, course instructors evaluate student work based on direct assessment tools for each PLO.
- Achievement levels for each PLO are calculated as percentages (e.g., proportion of students scoring 70 or above).
- Data are submitted to the Department Quality Committee.
- The committee analyzes data, compares them with target values, and proposes improvements to the Academic Board if necessary.
- Decisions are documented and translated into action plans for the following period.
Additional activities:
- Analysis of student course evaluation surveys
- Course success rate analysis (grade distributions) and improvement actions for low-performance courses
- Satisfaction measurement through graduation surveys
- Statistical reporting of student success, dropout, and graduation rates
Stakeholder Participation and Feedback Mechanisms
Objective: To collect data from internal and external stakeholders for program quality evaluation
Activities:
- External Stakeholder Meetings (industry representatives)
Timeline: November
- Internal Stakeholder Meetings (faculty coordination, internal evaluation reports)
Timeline: June
- Periodic Surveys: Graduate and employer surveys conducted every 3 years (starting 2026)
Continuous Improvement and Accreditation (Quality)
Objective: To manage the strategic development of the department through integrated data
Activities:
- Collection of unit activity reports
- Analysis and reporting of course evaluation survey results
- Coordination of quality and accreditation unit meetings
- Self-Assessment Report: SWOT analysis of strengths and weaknesses
- Preparation of improvement plans based on PLOs and stakeholder data
Timeline: June
Internship Committee
Prof. Mehmet Nedim DoÄŸan
Prof. İbrahim Çakmak
Assit. Prof. Dr. Sevdiye Yorgancı
Objective:
Monitoring internship processes and post-graduation outcomes
Activities:
- Collection of internship data
- Organization of pre-internship briefing meetings
- Coordination of student placements
Timeline:
- March: Briefings
- October: Internship report evaluation